Jump to content

Christmas TV and New Year dance programmes - discussion 2016


Recommended Posts

I just assumed that as Ms Bussell's name was on the cast sheet as a coach she was there that day to work hence checking the rehearsals board.

 

I'm sure she could have looked much more glamorous if it was set up for a 'famous dancer' ;)

 

Goodness, you must have sharp eyes.  I missed that, and I also thought it was odd that Bussell had turned up.  I did wonder why she was examining the cast lists so intently.  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 201
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Goodness, you must have sharp eyes. I missed that, and I also thought it was odd that Bussell had turned up. I did wonder why she was examining the cast lists so intently.

No my eyes are not that great :)

 

I actually meant that I had noticed her name on cast sheets that are given out at performances earlier. My poor poor punctuation probably caused the confusion if you thought I'd seen her name on the boards.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sad that people are always looking for a chance to have a dig at Darcey.

She is most certainly coaching Claire Calvert as SPF.

The other two people in the shot were Collier and Choe.

 

Speaking personally, I wasn't having a dig at Darcey.  I was just curious as to why she was there, and I did wonder if it was because she was doing some coaching.  I think it would have been nice if the commentary had mentioned this as her reason for being there, bearing in mind that she is a familiar face on the BBC.  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Speaking personally, I wasn't having a dig at Darcey. I was just curious as to why she was there, and I did wonder if it was because she was doing some coaching. I think it would have been nice if the commentary had mentioned this as her reason for being there, bearing in mind that she is a familiar face on the BBC.

 

Quite. I wasn't having a dig at her either, merely asking why she was there. Now I know she was there to coach, my question has been answered. It would indeed have been helpful for the commentary just to mention this simple fact. Edited by Jacqueline
  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I dare say it was contrived - but not by Darcey herself, more by the production team/director. Having someone 'pop in' to coach would be meaningless to most non-ballet people, unless it was Darcey who is known outside the ballet world, and so the students excitement at the famous face makes sense.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know for sure but I think that 'learning the steps' happens with the help of notators, repetiteurs, videos and watching others. Lesley Collier's role at the stage we saw on the film was to burnish the dancing and the interpretation.

 

I watched the Nut's documentary last night and would be interested if anyone else, other than me, noticed that during the section when Frankie and Alexander were rehearsing the GPDD in front of Ms Collier and Sir Peter the director cut to a picture of Ms Collier and Sir Peter exchanging a quick look with each other, both with expressions that said to me that this girl has got it. Hope it isn't me being fanciful but that look said more than any words.

 

I really enjoyed the whole documentary, the feeling of excitement at the school was very well captured and it didn't strike me that Darcey's appearance at the stage door was a set up nor the children's response at seeing her.

 

Frankie has posted a photo of herself on her Instagram account today ( frankiegoestohayward ) of life as a ballerina which is wonderful.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I noted the look, and hope that it really did mean that Ms Collier and Sir Peter were approving what they were watching at that moment as portrayed by the documentary.  However, I am somewhat cynical, that glance could have been in reaction to practically anything done or said, and just edited in.

 

It was generally a really effective documentary and I enjoyed it, but I also feel it might have confused people who weren't familiar with Nutcracker.  More explanation should have been given of the importance of Hans Peter and Clara to the plot. You could wonder why a girl in her nightie suddenly muscles in on the new Chinese dance they were so proud of!  As Anna-Rose O'Sullivan also came up through White Lodge it could have added an extra dimension.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don Q Fan said

"I noticed the program said it was Alexander Campbell's debut in a principal role but it was not - his debut as principal was with Roberta Marquez in Fille."

 

​It as stated that this was his first Principal role in a Classic

but is Fille not a classic too?!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I loved it, but for someone with theatrical background (me) watching a programme with a title of "behind the scenes" I would have liked to see more and hear more about the real behind the scenes incl the costs, metres of fabric for costumes and budget, shoes, cast size, staff behind the scenes. Even the orchestra.

 

What it actually takes to put a ballet together for its opening night.

 

Who makes up a ballet company from the youngest member of the company to the soloists themselves incl the hours put in.

 

And not just a biography on the SPF as fascinating as it was, without the rest there would be no RBC and the Nutcracker.  ;)

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The company still reserves the description "classic" for its nineteenth century repertory. I am not sure whether it continues to restrict this description to the five nineteenth century works which de Valois selected for her young company in the 1930's  or whether it has extended the category to include the other nineteenth century works which have subsequently entered its repertory. I don't think that I would extend the description to include Don Q which in its current choreographic form is almost entirely twentieth century, but I would as far as La Bayadere and La Sylphide are concerned.

 

As the company still persists in describing its twentieth century repertory as "heritage works" performing roles in ballets such as Fille does not count as appearing in the "classics". My own view is that as we approach the end of the second decade of the twenty first century  the company should really come to terms with its twentieth century repertory, which includes major works created for it by Ashton and MacMillan and major works by other significant twentieth century choreographers, and find a better description for it. The use of the word "heritage" does not seem to carry the same weight as "classic" does. The description "heritage work" suggests a ballet which may only be of local and short term significance to a company whereas the description "classic" suggests something of universal and continuing value

 

It was de Valois who decided that the five nineteenth century ballets which she had selected to form the technical touch stone for her young company should be described as "the classics". She selected the ballets in question for their  musical, choreographical and historical significance in the development of ballet as well as their utility as a training resource. She knew that she had to persuade an audience who  were used to seeing new works and knew and cared nothing about pre-DIaghilev repertory that the nineteenth century ballets she was going to stage had inherent value which was both universal and continuing.In short, her choice of the words " the classics " to describe these ballets was a marketing ploy which has proved to be a very effective one.

 

As the description "nineteenth century classics" has worked so well for the ballets in question I think that I would describe the major twentieth century works which the company dances as "twentieth century classics". I am not sure that "modern classic" is particularly appropriate for a ballets first seen in the 1960's such as Fille and Romeo and Juliet let alone those dating back to the 1940's such as Cinderella, Symphonic Variations, Scenes de Ballet and Serenade. 

Edited by FLOSS
  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

As far as coaching the principal roles is concerned there were,I think, eleven pairs of SPFs and Cavaliers to be coached and almost as many pairs of Claras and Hans Peters. I know that some of the Cavaliers are dancing with more than one SPF but they all have to train as a partner with each of the SPFs with whom they are to dance. There are nine people listed as coaches for the principal dancers which is the largest number that I have seen for a single production. I am not really sure that there is anything to be gained from speculating about whether the footage of Darcey looking at the noticeboard was staged, and to what purpose.The reality is that it is always a complicated job to get this production onto the stage and with the number of different casts and the number of debuts this season, considerably more complicated than usual.

Edited by FLOSS
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thought I would share the following with you. Just going through some early DVDs I recorded round about 2005(?), I came across a BBC half hour documentary about Darcey from which quite a few clips in this Christmas' documentary are taken. To my delight there is a wonderful sequence of Darcey coaching some girls at White Lodge and having fun with the dance of the cygnets. Two of these 'cygnets' are Yasmine and Francesca. Yasmine makes a further appearance as a young White Lodge student in a further recording I made on the same DVD of a masterclass for the Nutcracker in which she relates part of the story. A lovely find.

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just caught up with the Nutcracker documentary and really enjoyed it.

 

For me Campbell was the star of the show! what a completely charming man -and I love his dancing so it was a treat to see him preparing the role. he is fine partner.

 

I do agree with those who suggest that just a little less about Hayward- lovely dancer as she is- and  a little more on others would have improved it. But also, I wonder if it is really always wise or kind to boost people up so VERY much so early in their careers.

A little mystique is also a good thing for a ballerina.  One reason Fonteyn was so great is that she kept the mask on. Like the Queen.

 

However, it was interesting, moving and very entertaining to see the chlldren - who were a credit to the school- and the whole company working together as a team with such dedication. Thank goodness the trend for 'knocking' documentaries seems to have passed.

  • Like 9
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting that the Nutcracker programme and the Bussell/Fonteyn programme are already available as downloads from the BBC Store - £3.99 and £1.89 respectively, a bit more if you want HD. I hope they'll soon start releasing some of their older programmes too...

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I had another look at the provisional cast sheet shown early in the BBC's Nutcracker documentary. Interestingly, Matthew Ball was not listed as one of the dancers down to do The Prince! Very glad that there was a change of heart somewhere along the line  :)

Interesting. I wonder with whom Naghdi had been intended to dance given that they seem increasingly partnered together to wonderful reports: I'm looking forward to their Beauty very much. I understand that current management prefers a degree of flexibility rather than established partnerships but they do seem to be developing: not just Naghdi and Ball (let's not forget Salenko and McRae) but also Hayward and Campbell (who could well be the Collier and Jeffries of their generation as well as wonderful artists in their own right), Nunez and Muntagirov and Takada and Hay (does his stature obviate success in the Prince roles? I've yet to see him in that capacity but he's a dancer I like). Who will snaffle Reece Clarke? Cuthbertson and Yanowsky are both getting a chance, although the wonderful Zenaida is, of course, retiring ....

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...