Jump to content

Along the lines of 'is ballet getting too gymnastic?'!


Recommended Posts

Posted

At risk of playing devils advocate......(!)

 

I just came across this video on youtube which I believe to be an assessment/performance class of the Vaganova Academy and having previously followed threads on here discussing whether ballet is becoming too much like gymnastics particularly leg height etc this video got me thinking....

 

It seems that whether we like it or not, high extensions are being trained here!

 

  • Like 1
Posted

Wow, I think these extensions are gorgeous, and that the girls have incredible balance! i did find it interesting, though that at 14.43, they seemed to find the arabesque penche difficult- I mention this because my left leg is extremely flexible with developpes etc to the front/side, but I struggle to reach an 180 degree penche, but when using my right leg, although my hamstrings seem less flexible, my arabesque penche is relatively easy. The girls are all utterly amazing, though, how old would they be? :)

Posted (edited)

Got the youtube link through google - still doesn't work - just a big black box.

 

 

Tried the link directly - not through google - still doesn't work.

Edited by Anjuli_Bai
Posted

I thought that they all looked beautiful and very well trained, in my very limited view. I thought our training was for higher leg extensions but obviously not at the cost of poor technique. I only watched some of the video though.

Posted

I agree with Tulip - beautiful! (As one would expect...) I have nothing against high extensions, except jealousy of course :D, but it is what you do with them that I think matters. I don't see (in my opinion) vulgar oversplits here; I see controlled beautiful lines supported by rock solid technique. But I also wouldn't complain if the extensions weren't so high, as long as the artistry remains. Thankfully for us mere mortals lines can be made equally beautiful (or ugly) whether high or low, though I'm not a fan of more than 180 degrees.

  • Like 7
Posted

Exactly JCJC - it's what you do with them. I can think of any number of ballets where I do not think high extensions are appropriate but equally others where they would look spectacular. For me it is all about the artistry based on a good technique.

  • Like 5
Posted

I agree with Tulip - beautiful! (As one would expect...) I have nothing against high extensions, except jealousy of course :D, but it is what you do with them that I think matters. I don't see (in my opinion) vulgar oversplits here; I see controlled beautiful lines supported by rock solid technique. But I also wouldn't complain if the extensions weren't so high, as long as the artistry remains. Thankfully for us mere mortals lines can be made equally beautiful (or ugly) whether high or low, though I'm not a fan of more than 180 degrees.

 

I very much agree with this and what Janet McNulty said, too. What is appropriate for one ballet is not appropriate for another. Giselle's foot shouldn't be at her ear.

  • Like 3
Posted

This is lovely and I don't think the extensions are too high at all, although I didn't watch from start to finish. When I read Drdance's introduction I was expecting something far more extreme!

 

On another note, I think the film dispels the myth of all Russian dancers being stick thin. I see a range of physiques there that a equally engaging to watch.

  • Like 3
Posted

I think they are amazing and very artistic. One thing I've noticed - as they only have one barre, they do lots of turns at the barre. So often this is impossible because with a second lower barre there is a danger of hitting it with the knee.

  • Like 1
Posted

That is something that I noticed too, that they were all different sizes and not just skeletons. They all looked right for what they should be if that makes sense, not starved.

  • Like 4
Posted

That is something that I noticed too, that they were all different sizes and not just skeletons. They all looked right for what they should be if that makes sense, not starved.

 

My DD and I just watched in awe! I too was very happy to see that they are not all skinny tinie's and made my DD feel very much better about herself as she is not a 'skinny tiny' but tall, elegant and musular in the right places.

Posted

Gosh, I thought they were beautiful. I think they must be around the ages of between 13 and 15 years. This is why I love the Russian training so much, the teqnique, lines and placement is so precise. I also love the artistry, the way the dancers use their arms and heads to me is just lovely.

  • Like 1
Posted

Beautiful artistry; I agree that they are being encouraged to achieve high extensions but fortunately not in an overly gymnastic way in the sections I watched.

 

I think they're much nearer 15 than 13 though!

Posted

Oh please say they are older, because if they are as young as 13 and already at that standard, what chance has everyone else got? Mind you I am sure it all evens out in the long run.

  • Like 1
Posted

Marina Leonova the artistic director from the Bolshoi academy is one of the teachers watching. Looking at the DVD again I think you are right about the ages. They do look more about the age of 15 to me.

Posted
I think they are amazing and very artistic. One thing I've noticed - as they only have one barre, they do lots of turns at the barre. So often this is impossible because with a second lower barre there is a danger of hitting it with the knee.

 

This, however, is exactly the problem that the female dancer must learn to solve when dancing with a partner.

Posted

This, however, is exactly the problem that the female dancer must learn to solve when dancing with a partner.

And believe me , a male partner will not be impressed with a partner who hasn't mastered this...... ;)
  • Like 4
Posted

We do the same exercises but our back bend are nothing like as flexible and the tendus are a heck of a lot slower!

Posted

Don't the Russians do gymnastics, but not gymnatics as we know it, more like stretching and strenghening. I know that is part of their time table as well as drama meaning acting for character parts in a ballet?

Posted

OK now the debate has happened a bit I'll add my opinion! I was absolutely astounded by the strength and flexibility that these ladies have, but - and perhaps it's my English-ness here - I felt that they were pulling off their supporting legs a lot at the barre (is this a difference between English and Russian training maybe?) often as their gesture leg was up around their ears somewhere, and my knees were aching just watching their supporting legs....

 

It all looked so very, very difficult in its content - so many turns, changes of direction, legs in the air so high - yet all so effortless!

 

Having said that, if you can make THAT look easy, then the repertoire of most ballets will be a walk in the park!

  • Like 1
Posted

I didn't know what you meant Drdance, but my daughter did, she is young but she said 'It will still get them a career, it might be shorter one but best to get there than not'. Like I said she knew exactly what you meant, but she is only young and right now would do anything for a classical career.

Posted (edited)

For the pirouettes at the barre I meant that they were able to do the currently fashionable/required high retiré, which girls do while dancing alone. Partnered pirouette retiré is lower and more crossed - if the pirouette ends in retiré it is actually lifted to the higher position for the final pose.

Edited by Pas de Quatre
  • Like 1
Posted

Yes agreed about the supporting leg. Also not sure if just a different style but posture looks to be slightly out with backs and hip placement? Definitely training flexibility as a priority.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...