Jump to content

The Classics - contemporary versions


Recommended Posts

I was rather surprised to see the quote below in anon_dancer's blog which Janet put a link to on the thread discussing Akram Khan's Giselle.  

 

"To my knowledge, Matthew Bourne is the only other choreographer who has attempted to go anywhere near such classical well known ballets with his Tchaikovsky trilogy (Nutcracker, Swan Lake and Sleeping Beauty; all of which I have seen and thoroughly enjoyed) and turn them into entirely contemporised productions."

 

Everyone will have their own opinion of a production so the blog is valid as one person's view, but I thought it might be interesting to start a thread purely about other contemporary versions of the Classics as there are in fact many versions around.

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-7yCCVvfmPY

 

I will start the ball rolling with Mark Morris's "Hard Nut".  One of my favourites. This is a Youtube link to the party scene, but if you watch it, various other videos are offered.  I would recommend looking at the Snow scene.  His casting is gender neutral and sometime cross-dressing. 

 

He brings his company to UK regularly, but I don't think has ever brought this.  It has been shown on tv here - can't remember which channel.

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3CXJOrG4sQU

 

Another wonderful  new interpretation of a classic is Jean-Christophe Maillot's "La Belle" for his Ballets de Monte Carlo. Link above - a modern version of Sleeping Beauty.

 

Then of course there is Mat Eks version of Giselle - which I am afraid I cannot get on with!

 

Does Bejart's version of Firebird count?  I think I would call Firebird classic so probably yes!

 

What other re-interpretations of Classic should be included?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does Bejart's version of Firebird count?  I think I would call Firebird classic so probably yes!

 

If Firebird :), then I would also go with Faun (Cherkaoui), Spectre de la rose (Goecke), Sacre du Printemps (Bejart, Bausch)

 

Swan Lake (Keegan-Dolan)

 

From my limited knowledge, maybe Bourne stands out as he has done so many of them?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3CXJOrG4sQU

 

Another wonderful  new interpretation of a classic is Jean-Christophe Maillot's "La Belle" for his Ballets de Monte Carlo. Link above - a modern version of Sleeping Beauty.

 

 

 

 

 

Speaking personally, while there may be some interesting ideas in this, the little clip seems to show an enormous waste of all that gorgeous music. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Christopher Gable and Michael Pink produced a version of Giselle in 1997 that was set in a ghetto.  Although the choreography for Giselle and Albrecht was traditional, the Wilis were men and women in new choreography.  When I saw this production back to back with a traditional version I realised just how clever Act 2 was as it paid homage to the traditional.  I thought it was a magnificent production.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mats Ek has of course also done Swan Lake and Sleeping Beauty.  I suppose the question is, how do you define The Classics?  I wouldn't call Rite of Spring one, for one.

 Possibly a major ballet where music and choreography have co-existed for decades such as La Sylphide, not a ballet with a famous score that's inspired a number of choreographers throughout it's existence, e.g. RJ.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Northern Ballet have modified versions of some of the classics over the years, to mixed success.  I loved the end result of Christopher Gable/Michael Pink's version (modified from earlier versions of the same production) and I absolutely adore David Nixon's version.  His outer space production of Sleeping Beauty was not as successful but there were some lovely moments in it and it was a personal triumph for Georgina May as Aurora (and boy would I loved to have seen her as Aurora in a conventional version!).

 

I think it is harder for smaller companies to produce traditional versions of the classics.  I well remember Galina Samsova's lovely production of Swan Lake for Scottish Ballet being criticised because she could not field enough swans.  Around the same time the Gable/Pink production was being criticised for not having the Petipa/Ivanov Act 2.  Damned if they do and damned if they don't!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Shakti has a version of Swan Lake which I've had the privilege of seeing three times, once danced on her own and the other with her two regular co performers. It's not Swan Lake as we know it, focusing more on the birds rather than the people, but it is most definitely SL - the entire story is there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What other re-interpretations of Classic should be included?

 

My answer would be: none. I am sick an tired of what you call "re-interpretations of Classics". There have been all too many. Mark Morris at least I can understand: his Hard nut is a parody. Nearly every great ballet of the 19th century generated a parody in its time, except that the parodies were never considered to be "re-interpretations" and all have been quickly forgotten.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The BRB did The Cracked Nut twice. It was the beautiful Peter Wright production, which they messed about with - giant candy cane for Clara, seemingly endless Sugar Plum Faries chasing the Prince, Roger Cook (remember him) making an appearance to confront King Rat, lots of guest appearances such as Rusty Lee, Brian Conley, etc. Great fun!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The BRB did The Cracked Nut twice. It was the beautiful Peter Wright production, which they messed about with - giant candy cane for Clara, seemingly endless Sugar Plum Faries chasing the Prince, Roger Cook (remember him) making an appearance to confront King Rat, lots of guest appearances such as Rusty Lee, Brian Conley, etc. Great fun!

 

 

It was absolutely dire!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My answer would be: none. I am sick an tired of what you call "re-interpretations of Classics". There have been all too many. Mark Morris at least I can understand: his Hard nut is a parody. Nearly every great ballet of the 19th century generated a parody in its time, except that the parodies were never considered to be "re-interpretations" and all have been quickly forgotten.

 

I think the world would be a poorer place without David Dawson's Giselle and John Neumeier's Swan Lake, though I love the traditional Giselle  to bits, and many traditional Swan Lakes too. There is no shortage of traditional versions around; when we let artists be free to have their own vision sometimes we make amazing discoveries. Not everything will be a success but that is true of more traditional versions too. For instance I loathe the Grigorovich Swan Lake that the Bolshoi does. Art involves risk.

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...