Jump to content

Cayetana

Members
  • Posts

    37
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation

92 Excellent

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Female
  • Location:
    London

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. They didn't wear tutu at performance but before it. She explains here: https://www.instagram.com/reel/C4-vO6ZoDGQ/?igsh=bm5tbWRlcnY3b21m We should keep promoting!! I am always surprised so many people find opera ho. Elitist and I keep reminding them of booking early, Friday rush, Yong ROH and the wonderfulness of it all
  2. Alas, I cannot use this ticket (Amphitheatre Lower Slips, B5, £9) now. Luckily, I found one for when I'll be able to attend. Please leave a message here and DM me if interested.
  3. I think you are right. Inoticed that too Sad as it is, the injury added yet another larger to the poignancy of the piece. Of course I'm dejected hat door piano is injured What a hard Art this is.
  4. Went on Monday. Loved the actual direction and interpretation but found staging itself lacking and at points caricaturesque (the children holding boards?!). All the women shone brightly (even if Michaela’s looks were a joke - first student then church “beata” with a rosary as a medal?!). Carmen herself (Aigul) I found fascinating in all areas - beautiful singing and nonchalant acting. So much so I want to see her in Glyndebourne on same role.
  5. I found Dances C exhilarating and, for my taste, aesthetically memorable - I thoroughly enjoyed the 50s vintage, Piper-esque landscape, the quirky costumes (the hairdos with their finials, the decorative symbols, the colour scheme and of course, last but not least, the music which almost seemed to follow the dancing) a fairy tale of a chess party where each dancer became a piece in an imaginary, living game board. The game fast, unexpected, always transforming. The "teams" regrouping and scamping according to a secret logic. Arrows and colours, directions. Individual yet anonymous. And a queenly master of ceremonies. I found myself totally in the moment, in empathetic delight. I loved the whole company's dancing, and Gasparini, rather magnetic. I found the whole intelligent, fun, inventive - totally life-enhancing. As for Different Dreamer and Requiem, both extraordinary. One, Kafkaesque drama of vivid despair; the other, sublime human aspiration. I totally relished this programme which I found both beautiful and thought-provoking in loads of directions. Music 10/10 in all three pieces, and all the dancers and dancing equally top notch. Engrossing! (I have enjoyed so much reading all the thoughtful comments; This Forum must be one of my luckiest finds last year: a terrific balletic community!)
  6. It is!! THANK YOU, Roberta, for the top links and references re Duo C - I had never seen this ballet and found it wonderful as danced by Indiana Woodward and Taylor Stanley on Friday. Seemed to me like a "history of dancing" with the last, unexpected, movement a sort of narrative dance in the spotlight, as lyric as the lyricism of the music, and as "cinematic" as I have now learned listening to your sources. I found it exhilarating - music and dancers alike. The film of Key Mazzo and Peter Martins dancing the piece is tremendous too. I thought that on paper the programme was interesting in its parallels, convergences and contrasts . As most people, Rotunda did not grip me, bar the solo of Megan Fairchild. The role of the musical instruments in both middle pieces made me happily think, as they were used so differently after opening the ballets exactly in the same manner, with the dancers listening intently. I loved in the GustaveleG how percussion and balance seemed (to me) to be at the centre of the dancing, and the apparently pointless piano displacement made me, again, small and think. I didn't see it gratuitous in the end, but a coda to the narrative (the listening bit around the piano) beginning. The red costumes were both abstract columns of colour and reminiscent of some monastic order - it really worked for me, as the last piece, the Love Letter, did. I was up in the second circle and the volume was not distracting and I did not mind much that it was recorded. I found the piece rich in every aspect, and the unusual (for me) music made sense in context. I totally suspended disbelief and was intrigued from beginning to end (that was also the case with Duo C and GlG). The pdd of the two male dancers towards the end was beautiful. The breaks between movements could have been done more interestingly. As someone pointed out, the costumes had 17c touches and were whimsical in a sort of sarcastic way - a bit burlesque of the classical tradition. Two male dancers looked great in and made good use of their outsized feathered headdresses a la Bayadere etc. The lighting was mesmerising even if I concur with someone who said that it made it difficult to distinguish the faces of the dancers, but they are so individual that soon I knew who was who even if anonymous. I know is sad, but what a team!!!! A great night overall. Thank you again Roberta for the links!!!
×
×
  • Create New...