Jump to content

bridiem

Members
  • Posts

    4,021
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by bridiem

  1. 2 minutes ago, Dawnstar said:

    Extremely relieved to report that I managed to get the tickets I wanted: 8th March for me & my mother plus 5th March for me. I've been so stressed about it that it took me several attempts to put in the right card number, I nearly started crying when I finally got the confirmation screen, & I'm still shaking!

     

    Yay!!

    • Like 2
    • Thanks 1
  2. 17 minutes ago, Dawnstar said:

    I am dreading tomorrow's rush. For ages, long before Campbell's retirement was announced, I'd been hoping to get tickets for 5th &8th. Now the 8th is going to be a nightmare to try to get a ticket for & I'm worried that while I'm trying to get 8th then all the tickets for 5th will also go & I'll be left with nothing.

     

    Good luck, @Dawnstar! I hope you do get tickets.

    • Like 5
    • Thanks 1
  3. 9 hours ago, Bruce Wall said:

    See that ALL the NYCB performances (short of the Thursday matinee which has 'limited availability) are SOLD OUT.  Spalding obvously clearly knew what he needed to do to appeal to his dedicated UK audience.  Well done him.  Credit where credit is due.  

     

    Or, in my case at least, I'm going simply because it's NYCB and more in spite of rather than because of the programme. 

    • Like 8
  4. 3 minutes ago, LinMM said:

    Well unfortunately another triumph it looks like I will be missing. I seem doomed to have a winter without any ballet ( either watching or doing!) 
    Having not had a sign of a cold for over a year…. I’ve now got a really bad cough and cold which has come on over the weekend!! I can’t see it improving enough in time for me to come up to London tomorrow and not cough consistently throughout the performance 😬 so looks like sadly I will be missing tomorrows Manon. 

     

    So sorry to hear this, LinMM! I hope you can get to the 7th and/or 8th performances.

    • Like 3
  5. Impossible, really, to believe that this was Kaneko's début as Manon. She clearly knew exactly what she wanted to do with the role, and did it with no holds barred. I agree with @MildConcern that she wasn't nearly as dazzled by the finery as some Manons; she was acting mainly out of loyalty, or even obedience, to her brother. In fact, for the first time tonight I saw (and felt) the parallels with Von Rothbart and Odile; Manon constantly confers with Lescaut (an excellent début from Joseph Sissens) and then returns to use her powers to dupe Monsieur G.M. But (unlike Odile) her heart really isn't in it - it's with Des Grieux. She's already given herself to him. Kaneko is so beautiful and elegant that her downfall in Act III is all the more shocking to see; from heady perfection to abject humiliation. Devastating.

     

    Unlike @MildConcern, I actually found myself a little frustrated with Muntagirov in Act I; I felt as if he was holding back a bit, or not fully engaged. But he more than made up for it in Act II with a beautiful, yearning, despairing first solo and plenty of passionate engagement with Manon, and in Act III where he flung himself into the drama with complete abandon. The final pas de deux was positively operatic in its grandeur and intensity. Stunning. 

    • Like 17
    • Thanks 1
  6. 5 minutes ago, Fonty said:

    I am not clear what the AD for the RAD actually does?  

     

    When the last AD was appointed, his role was said to be 'providing artistic leadership, creativity and expertise to all areas of the Academy’s work, maintaining its artistic integrity and leading on the development of its artistic, education and community initiatives on a global scale'. I assume that is still broadly the remit now.

    • Like 3
    • Thanks 4
  7. 13 minutes ago, capybara said:

    This announcement has caused me to reflect on Alex’s performances. Conclusion: he seemed to be able to ‘deliver in spades’ across an incredibly wide range of rep., with characterisation being a particular strength.

    The amount of pleasure you have given me, Alex, is MASSIVE. 
    Thank you soooo much 🔥👏🌸

     

    Seconded! He has so many qualities that have made him such a special dancer: purity of line, technical strength and cleanliness, musicality, dramatic skills, sincerity, unobtrusive and sensitive partnering, and a rare kind of showmanship that is theatrical without ever being showy. He approaches all his roles with such intelligence, and produces performances that are consistently interesting, beautiful and (when required!) moving. A very rare talent.

     

     

    • Like 23
  8. 10 minutes ago, Rob S said:

     

    Looking at the instagram post the same post was simultaneously placed on each organisation's account...although there's nothing yet on the ROH website

     

    Thanks, Rob S. Not sure why Instagram should be considered the right place for such an announcement, but at least they did both announce it. (I only check Instagram occasionally since I think of it as a site for photos/videos rather than news.)

    • Like 1
  9. I have to say that I am quite heartbroken at the thought of not seeing him dance (and act!!) any more. He is still at the height of his powers and as his Lescaut last week showed he is a really superb dance-actor. But he has been very under-used in recent years so I'm not surprised he's been looking elsewhere, and this does sound like an excellent opportunity for him. Of course it's good to stop dancing before you decline, but it does make it very hard for your audience! I hadn't booked for 8th March but have just gone online and booked the last seat in the Amphi - restricted view and if I can find something better before then I will, but at least I will be there! The RAD are, I think, very fortunate to have acquired his services and I wish him happiness and fulfillment in his new role.

    • Like 17
  10. 39 minutes ago, Linnzi5 said:

    Maybe I'm being obtuse here. But 'New Choreography' to me means new pieces of dance, not seen before? I.e. premieres?  It doesn't state new or young choreographers, does it? I genuinely am asking if the premise is for new, original works or is the premise to showcase young and new choreographers? 

     

    bangorballetboy was referring to/confused by a post of mine saying that the festival was aimed at young/upcoming choreographers, which (admittedly) is not what the title says.

    • Like 2
    • Thanks 1
  11. 1 hour ago, ChrisG said:

    Hayward and Sambé this afternoon. No words - just sublime!

     

    Absolutely. Sublime. Both together and individually. Hayward a highly reluctant gold-digger, positively skittish in her ecstatic love for DG; Sambé in complete thrall to his adored Manon and unable to believe the disaster that befalls them. Both of them danced unbelievably beautifully and expressively, as if with one body and one heart. And a tremendous supporting cast again (Campbell, Magri, Avis, Edmonds et al). Sublime.

    • Like 17
  12. 1 hour ago, bangorballetboy said:

     

    I’m a bit confused by this.  The clue for me is in the name: “Festival of New Choreography”.  With the greatest respect to them, I wouldn’t call November, McNally, Binet, Bond, Zucchetti or Powell-Main particularly young and they are all well established choreographers.

     

    OK - I suppose the terms 'young' and 'upcoming' are relative (and I must admit that I hadn't even registered that Zucchetti was participating). But I do think that Lang has a significant reputation and could/should have been commissioned for a main stage work before now.

    • Like 4
  13. I thought it was highly likely that at least some critics would not like Twinkle. It was neither edgy nor groundbreaking; it was quietly rather than showily creative; and it was charming rather than challenging. It also used classical technique without seeking to distort - or deconstruct, or reinvent - it in any way. In fact, it was positively counter-cultural in its respect for and mastery of straight-down-the-line classical ballet. And it used traditional and familiar classical music. But for me, all those things marked it out as something rare and wonderful. And in many ways also marked it out as the bravest work on the programme. (It does, however, have a rather silly name... but I suppose it is at least memorable!).

    • Like 23
    • Thanks 1
  14. 17 minutes ago, Mary said:

    Of course Jessica Lang is not a new choreographer but an established one who has worked with ballet companies round the world including BRB.

    Wouldn't it be great if she became an associate choreographer for one of the UK companies for a year or 2 and gave us some more work made on the dancers. She really does use the ballet form, to be danced to music not against it, and to real, live music, not a 'soundtrack' - all designed with much style and wit. I can see her making something very lovely for Muntagirov  - and that is long overdue. If I win on the premium bonds that's what I'd spend the money on!

    'Dream on'.

     

    Yes, completely agree - in fact I did think that she should have been commissioned in her own right and not as part of a 'festival of new choreography' which is otherwise clearly aimed at young/upcoming choreographers. 

    • Like 5
×
×
  • Create New...