Jump to content

Scheherezade

Members
  • Posts

    1,788
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Scheherezade

  1. I am reluctant to identify the partner as she is well known. And clearly able to hold a balance for an absolute age. Suffice it to say it wasn't Fonteyn .And I think that the difficulties in dancing with Nureyev were equally well known at the time. I should add that I remain an absolute, unreformed fan, however difficult he might have been as a partner.

     

    I'd be interested, by the way, to learn what others think of Muntagirov's partnering skills. To me, he can scarcely do wrong, either solo or as a partner.

    • Like 1
  2. 7 minutes ago, penelopesimpson said:

     ... I find the whole Strictly thing with Darcey as a judge and Ore winning and Anita Rani as a finalist, totally weird.  Having said that, thought Rani was excellent last night and she looked fantastic.

     

    As for the winner, yes I thought she was stunning but I didn't want to watch her.  Her movement was fantastic but it was all too masculine and lacked any appeal for me.

     

    Yes, both Darcey and Anita Rani looked fantastic. As, for that matter, did Ore Oduba. And I totally agree about the winner. Fabulous quality of movement but it really was extremely masculine, which is entirely different from projecting strength, as, for instance, with dancers such as Tamara Rojo. 

  3. I recall being told by a male dancer who was in the corps in the early 70s of one occasion when Nureyev, dancing with a partner he did not like, deliberately went off on an unrehearsed, unchoreographed solo spree leaving his partner balancing on one pointe for what seemed like an eternity. Although, as always, Nureyev was catnip to the audience, to his extreme annoyance his partner, who retained her balance thoughout, brought the house down. 

    • Like 2
  4. 13 hours ago, taxi4ballet said:

    Does anyone else think that ballet competitors are slightly at a disadvantage, as they have to perform a set classical variation, whereas the other dancers aren't limited by that consideration? It is also quite difficult for male ballet dancers to stand out in duets, as it is more of a supporting role in a way.

     

     

    Ballet competitors are also at a disadvantage in that it is hard for them to appear relevant when an out of context excerpt danced in tutus, tights and other period-style costume is shown on screen. The male ballet dancers may have to cast a wider net and draw upon current works, including pas de deux for two men, if they are to hold their own. The obvious examples are Wayne McGregor (Obsidian Tear, Multiverse), Wheeldon's After the Rain or some of the work recently danced by the ENB, provided that they are allowed to dance excerpts from pieces such as these and that they are sufficiently adept and well-trained.

    • Like 1
  5. I have now seen two of the casts (the Cuthbertson/Muntagirov and Nunez/Soares Diamonds casts but Takada/Heap and Campbell in each) and, having loved McRae in Rubies last time round, I have to agree with Nina G's definitive casts. As with so many other posters, I am really bemused as to why Nunez and Muntagirov were not cast together, more particularly when past form dictates that they are in a league of their own in pieces such as this and bounce off each other in such a breathtaking way.

     

    I am a big fan of Campbell but Rubies really is McRae's stand-out piece. His speed, flair and quicksilver qualities bring this piece to life in a way that I have yet to see with anyone else although I was impressed by both Takada and Heap.

     

    Naghdi, as is increasingly the case, brought her own special lyricism to Emeralds and, again as usual, it was impossible to drag one's eyes away from the wonderful Morera, who really seems to be achieving the recognition that she deserves under O'Hare's stewardship. As others have already said, Gasparini also stood out for me. I agree with To the Pointe's observations on Emeralds, which held my attention far more than previously, no doubt due to the quality of the performances.

     

    Overall, just lovely!

     

    • Like 7
  6. Yup, agree with all the positive responses to Lohengrin and particularly pleased that Klaus Florian Vogt will be back on the UK stage. Also happy about the Opera Rara concert performance of L'Ange de Nisida.

    Surprised at the Hvorostovsky casting since it wasn't all that long ago that we were told that his balance problems had put an end to full-on opera, although he is also slated for a couple of performances at the Liceu so hopefully all is well, and is the Netrebko Lady Macbeth the promised trade-off for her withdrawal from Norma?

    The Di Donato/Barcellona double act again in Semiramide (La Donna del Lago anyone?) but can Joyce match Shagimuratova at last year's Proms?

    Too many of the usual suspects, as per usual, with most of them featuring in the cinema broadcasts, it would seem, and why yet another outing for the muddled KH Don Giovanni?

    I agree with Sim that overall the opera programme looks more promising than the ballet but, let's face it, that isn't saying much. Oh well, we shall see what we shall see!

  7. I know several people who play/dep at the ROH and all of the above is true. At the time of the last closure around the millennium the decision was taken not to extend the pit and it is now one of the smallest in Europe relative to the size of orchestra regularly used. Removing the side seats releases some the 'trapped' sound, and though I was a frequent purchaser of those seats I would rather give them up and have musicians avoid permanent hearing damage.

     

    This information is very useful, Lindsay, and, as John PW has said, helps to explain what, for me at least, was previously a benefit that was far from apparent. Why, however, was a decision taken not to extend the orchestra pit during the last closure? It was not all that long ago and the dangers to the musicians must surely have been known.

×
×
  • Create New...