thewinelake Posted February 24, 2014 Share Posted February 24, 2014 Hello, I'm a ballet Dad whose DDs and DW do quite a lot of dancing... One thing I was curious about and was hoping I might get enlightenment on is why do so many ballerinas wear those frilly arm-bands with their tutus (tuti?)? I presume it's a traditional thing, but to me it spoils the look of the arms... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anna C Posted February 24, 2014 Share Posted February 24, 2014 Hello thewinelake, welcome to the forum! That is not a question I've ever heard before - I would assume that dancers in companies wear the costumes they are given and don't have a lot of input into the design of the costume. Maybe the arm frills are traditional, dating back to original costume designs? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Belljul Posted February 24, 2014 Share Posted February 24, 2014 Hello thewinelake. Funnily I have questioned these little arm frills to myself too. They are rather unusual. Are they just a pretty extra or is there more to their existence? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anjuli_Bai Posted February 24, 2014 Share Posted February 24, 2014 If you go to Google Images and look at old costumes of the Romantic Era, you will see that most of the costumes had much more of a sleeve. I think the arm band type frill (which is often almost invisibly attached to the costume rather than a truly detached arm band) is a "residual" sleeve. Generally speaking, the ballet costumes of yore were much less revealing. An example is the "short" tutu which was longer and droopier than the ultra short, hard, discus like tutu we see today. Look at pictures of Anna Pavlova and see how long her short tutus were! Sleeves - though short - were important not so much to cover the arms as to cover the shoulder. Or pretend to cover the shoulder. Even today in some very traditional weddings it is religiously important that the bride's shoulders are covered and some also include that protocol for the arms. Also different was that frills were added to the panty of the tutu so that it blended in much more and the lines not so shsarply obvious between the skirt and the panty. There are a number of "residuals" in costuming - such as the barely visible piece of cloth at Giselle's waist - that used to be a rather full size apron which of course made clear her social status as a peasant/working class. People of yore were very particular about who was allowed to wear what. The sumptuary laws are full of those prohibitions and details. 7 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Karen Posted February 24, 2014 Share Posted February 24, 2014 (edited) I scribed for an adjudicator at a festival who disliked arm band sleeves intently and commented on the reports of all who wore them, 'sleeves are not necessary!' Edited to say, this was when dancers were wearing tutus, not any other costumes! Edited February 24, 2014 by Karen 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Belljul Posted February 26, 2014 Share Posted February 26, 2014 Thanks Anjuli. Interesting. I will look for the cloth at Giselle's waist next time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now