Jump to content

Lindsay

Members
  • Posts

    594
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Lindsay

  1. Agree, I saw this in the House last night and while Grigorian was by far the strongest singer (and really this IS Butterfly's opera!) some of the supporting performances, especially Suzuki and Sharpless, were excellent too. I wasn't so sure about Pinkerton and this production has nothing particularly interesting about it but at least the director is not undermining the tragedy of Butterfly's story and the music sounded beautiful!
  2. I thought so too. But there are a lot of references that benefit from familiarity with the imagery - for example Marie’s Magdalene-like washing the feet of the soldier wearing the crown of thorns with her hair. That idea of interiority as if stuck in a nightmare has gone out of fashion on the stage today too - audiences seem to prefer their stories more literal
  3. Indeed. I think he was very lucky to be able to do so. Mason (and her predecessors) really did have to cast a wider net given the state of the school pre-Stock, and although that brought us glories in the form of Acosta, Zanowsky, Cojocaru, Kobborg, Rojo, Bonelli and (not least!) Nunez, the corps de ballet could look very disparate and ragged at times....
  4. Yes, you have an interesting perspective there. In my view, a lot of credit for the change over the last decade must go to Gailene Stock for hugely raising the standards at RBS. She brought through most of the current principal 'class' under her tenure, including Hayward, Bracewell, Ball, Naghdi, Clarke and O'Sullivan (plus Sissens on the principal-in-waiting side) who all attended White Lodge. I think mixing that strong 'homegrown' pipeline with the introduction of technically brilliant dancers in the Upper School (Sambe, Magri, Acri, Richardson etc.) has borne considerable fruit for the company. It would be very interesting if one were now to take a similar break to imagine what the company might look like in 2035 (!), with the school having shifted the balance to a much larger proportion of international prizewinners...
  5. I agree Beaker. I remember seeing some really good principal performances at the end of the 'Mason years' but often being a bit on edge for the pas de trois (in the 'old' swan lake production) or the pas de six in Giselle, Myrtha's solo, Lilac Fairy etc. because there were quite a few soloists where I could sense their nerves about getting through the difficult bits. Very rare for me to feel that nowadays - there is much more technical strength in depth. Of course artistry is what we are all looking for but, if dancers are visibly uncomfortable with the steps (not having the odd slip or fall from really pushing, which is fine, but struggling and/or 'cheating' all the way through a variation ), I find that ship has pretty much sailed.....
  6. Coincidentally, I am at this very moment taking this wise advice literally. I noticed that I have a free evening on a work trip to Paris in a couple of weeks and have just managed to nab a ticket for Don Quixote at the Bastille. Hannah O'Neill and German Louvet that night so very much looking forward to it!
  7. I I wouldn't disagree with you there but I thought the casts I saw (although I couldn't see all of them) in the last Ashton bill a very pleasant surprise - particularly Lamb and Muntagirov in Scenes de Ballet and Hayward in Rhapsody. Would be interested to see Symphonic Variations again, since that is the ballet I remember thinking looked under-rehearsed/un-idiomatic last time I saw it.
  8. I think it's natural when you see a LOT of ballet (as many forumites do - I know I am guilty of this in periods when a work lull coincides with programming I want to see) to get jaded and want novelty all the time. But also the more you see, the more one can learn to appreciate the difference between "really excellent absolutely at the top of their game" dancing and the kind of "dancers of their generation" performance we saw last night. For me, Nunez, Muntagirov, Osipova and Hayward (in the right roles because of her amazing acting skills) can all hit those heights Edit to add: One thing that I am enjoying about the current period (and like others I have been around since the Dowell days) is that more or less every performance reaches "really excellent absolutely at the top of their game" standards of dancing - which has not always been the case
  9. On tonight’s evidence I think there is simply no option but to give first night to Nunez and Muntagirov. I think seeing them so often it’s easy to forget quite how lucky we are to have them in London. Not that other dancers aren’t very exciting and exceptional (I am planning to see several casts and looking forward to all of them) but there is a different level of quality with these two. In particular, I thought Nunez’ Act 2 Odette variation was quite exquisite tonight - amazing how she is still pushing to improve at this point in her career. The musicality on the turning sequences was beautiful - because her technique is so secure, she can play with the music and Kessels worked with her perfectly. And in a lovely gesture she and Vadim turned around to bow to and acknowledge the corps de ballet during the curtain calls. A great start to the run
  10. Well he has been in the studios at the ROH today rehearsing with Osipova - photos on both of their instagrams. I hope this is for something we can see in London!
  11. Whilst I didn’t totally love that piece, I think its strength came from Mayara Magri’s force of personality and stage presence. I agree with you to the extent that the classical technique required was not so difficult as Twinkle, but I think it required a magnetic presence, even (or especially perhaps) in the slow opening moments, which is something Magri has had in bucketloads ever since her Prix de Lausanne performance. Other than her, I think the piece might in fact be better performed by non-classically trained dancers to whom the rhythmic, relaxed movements were more familiar - there was a certain rigidity from some dancers that jarred a little for me. I think Jessica Lang’s decision to play to the strengths of the dancers before her was a wise one and I loved the witty touches in her piece - which I imagine could be an attractive addition to the repertoire for many companies
  12. I totally agree Sim - Hayward is really made for this role. Her beautiful arms and epaulement in particular struck me tonight and this is a part which really calls for strong acting. Campbell is such a good actor too and the commitment from all the leads was total - really glad to have seen it.
  13. Thirded on that. I do think Wheeldon is a better choreographer when he has better music - I love his Polyphonia to Ligeti’s music - way more interesting than the sludgy narrative stuff…
  14. I think I saw Davi Ramos in the Giselle peasant pas de quatre with Het recently. If he is the dancer I'm thinking of that is an excellent hire for the Australian ballet!
  15. well yes, because she is a generational talent who can sell tickets globally. And “whatever she likes” can often show us these roles in a new creative way (see her Giselle for example). This is art - not the army - the aim isn’t to create replicants.
  16. Me neither. Paco, are you referring to the fact that Natalia didn't use her fan on the last diagonal but held it closed above her head instead? That was of course different from the usual step but I don't think it makes it any easier. And those fouettes didn't look like a display of tiredness from where I was sitting...
  17. Agree with Rob. That was very secure indeed and stylish for a first go at the Dryad Queen! Osipova went full comedy Kitri - won’t be for everyone but you can’t say it isn’t exciting. The steps are so easy for her that she just wanders around the stage being a real-life person and occasionally chucking in some pyrotechnics. Started the fouettés late, steamed through with mostly triples then strolled off with her hands on her hips. So different from every other ballerina doing it ‘properly’ but I love her!
  18. I think that Sasaki is due a big break. From what I have seen she has been the strongest of the current soloist crop in the 'difficult' classical roles. She was outstanding as the SPF and also (in my humble opinion) the best Queen of the Dryads in the recent run. She has a very clean technique, doesn't seem prone to panic and also brings a lovely musical sense of phrasing.
  19. I imagine that the researchers are thinking of shows like the current Cabaret in the West End (pre-show entertainment, foyer areas redesigned as a Berlin nightclub, drinks and foods at seat, theatre redesigned so the first few rows of the stalls are replaced with cabaret style tables) and Guys and Dolls at the Bridge (stalls seating taken out so a large part of the audience stands and follows the show around, with NY-style pretzel sellers and so on mingling with the crowd at the interval). Both of those shows were great fun, performed to a very high standard, the audiences very well behaved and quiet during the actual performances and both have been commercially and artistically successful. They become a 'novelty event', attract lots of press coverage and casual/occasional theatre goers will buy tickets for the experience. However, they take a considerable investment to re-do the space "for a specific show" in a style which is appropriate to that show (taking us to 1930s Berlin nightclubs or 1940s Broadway)!! It is lunacy and ridiculously simplistic to think this idea can cross over into lyric theatres whose raison d'etre (at least thus far) is to run a series of different show in one season. I would hate to see Coli given over to a year of Swan Lake or Tosca, with whatever decor that might command (although I might have fun thinking about the menu and concessions) I don't blame artistic and management teams of lyric theatres for trying to think of new ways to spark interest in their shows in a very competitive market (unlike the West End, they can't bring in big TV or film stars to attract crowds). But I think they have to be realistic about what is achievable in subsidised theatre which can't afford a heavy up front investment for every show and which is reliant on a regular (and quite conservative with a small c) audience.
  20. The girl sitting next to me in the amphi filmed most of the show last night..
  21. The U.K. simply does not have a lyric theatre tradition in the same way as Germany, Italy, Russia or France. And consequently we don’t have the buildings with the storied history of those arts.
  22. Naghdi is really hitting her prime. Makes it all look so easy and her frank enjoyment is infectious. Perfect for this ballet. Also a very impressive Dryad Queen from Mariko Sasaki - not only impeccable technique but managed to make the (imho sometimes rather dull and repetitive) solo look brand new. I loved how she started low and really built the opening and her arms were beautifully expressive
  23. Back in the day (late 90s/early 00s when I was a penniless ballet goer) it used to be via via staff/volunteers word of mouth. Friends who worked at the House would call around 'on the day' and a posse of those of us with nothing else to do would find ourselves anywhere from the Slips to the Grand Tier (am I right in thinking it was the Vilar Grand Tier before his fall from grace, or was that just the Floral Hall?). I do know that at least three of us who benefitted from those freebies have 'grown up' into regular paying attendees for opera and ballet, so it may not be the worst way in the world to develop future audiences...
  24. Agree that he has been an excellent ambassador for ballet and I wouldn't see Bolle in 'just anything' these days (and he would frankly never have been my first choice for Petipa in any case). However, I do think that he is still well suited to Manon - Des Grieux is really not a physically virtuoso role but it does require a degree of sensitive partnering and acting which I don't think 'just anyone' can deliver.
  25. Yes, I sympathise with that view and was partly joking. But I also feel (as someone who, like most here, has watched an unreasonable amount of ballet over the years) that I am more and more drawn to watching dancers at the absolute 'top of their game' whenever I get the opportunity, and for me Bolle is in that category. A few years ago I would have jumped at the opportunity to watch a debut from an up-and-comer, but with a few exceptions (for example Francesca Hayward's debut in Rhapsody which was an absolute revelation) I find that when you have seen a ballet dozens of times, the most enjoyable performances come from those like Nunez, Muntagirov and Osipova, who can manage the technique in their sleep and have had an opportunity to really develop their interpretation in their 'best' roles and show you why they are considered so 'special'. I am also off to see Smirnova's Giselle in Amsterdam this week for exactly that reason.
×
×
  • Create New...