Nicola H Posted November 8, 2018 Share Posted November 8, 2018 looks like we'll have to send the mods some more loctite 638 ... ( high strength, rapid curing thread locking fluid for the none geeky ) unfortunately over recent weeks it seems a lot of people haven't borne heed of what the mods say about real names and the truly controversial comments that might be made ... the Ballet West discussion and now the RBS discussion loacked becasue people are making direct accusations against named managers / leaders/ teachers while hiding behind pseudonyms ... there reaches a point where the mods may just think 'sod it' and put the shutters down. - the the detriment of the rest of the dance community 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sophoife Posted November 8, 2018 Share Posted November 8, 2018 (edited) I for one am happy to put my name to a criticism, and have done so both here and on an external site. Possibly I'm happy so to do because I don't have a child who dances, but I agree, if a thing is wrong in one's opinion, one should speak up, identifying oneself. Anna Campbell (with no relations who dance, unless you count my nieces with a different surname who allegedly perform hip-hop but all I can see is two kids (not them 🤣) out the front doing moves and the bulk of them standing at the side or the back stomping their feet) Edited November 8, 2018 by Sophoife 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
taxi4ballet Posted November 8, 2018 Share Posted November 8, 2018 In this particular case, reference is made to a specific child, and while you can talk about your own child, you aren't supposed to discuss someone else's, especially when that child can be identified by the remarks. The moderators of this site are all volunteers and have to err on the side of caution. 8 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sarahw Posted November 8, 2018 Share Posted November 8, 2018 I understand that comments made about individual kids are inappropriate. However I feel frustrated that this valuable forum for parents is being hampered. While I understand the need for negative posts to be attributable there are issues for parents of kids in vocational training where many fear their children's future could be affected by comments they make. I also feel that public figures like Mr Powney's must expect to receive feedback, both positive and negative, when contentious statements are made. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LinMM Posted November 8, 2018 Share Posted November 8, 2018 I do agree with the cautious approach etc especially as threads can move very fast sometimes so difficult to keep up with the monitoring but cannot the posts just be removed that are contravening policy etc and perhaps a reminder but the rest and thread be kept open? Having said that perhaps this particular topic today is bound to attract negative comments in the end because his statement is so obviously controversial! 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
glissade Posted November 8, 2018 Share Posted November 8, 2018 (edited) 2 hours ago, taxi4ballet said: In this particular case, reference is made to a specific child, and while you can talk about your own child, you aren't supposed to discuss someone else's, especially when that child can be identified by the remarks. The moderators of this site are all volunteers and have to err on the side of caution. Imagining myself in the position of a mother of a named child on this forum, I would be very grateful if the moderators locked threads while they consider what is being said about my child rather than allow comments to run away with themselves. In instances of criticism against paid professionals, then I would caution all posting to bear in mind the very real-world possibility of being held to account for what is written ...... which doesn't mean, "Don't post". It just means, be mindful of the law. Edited November 8, 2018 by glissade 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
glissade Posted November 8, 2018 Share Posted November 8, 2018 Just another thought on locked threads and bans from mentioning ..... From the point of view of discussion in a forum, it might be helpful if some timescale could be indicated. Eg. nobody is allowed to mention Ballet West for at least x number of weeks (while x happens - if that can be outlined). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anna C Posted November 8, 2018 Share Posted November 8, 2018 2 minutes ago, glissade said: Just another thought on locked threads and bans from mentioning ..... From the point of view of discussion in a forum, it might be helpful if some timescale could be indicated. Eg. nobody is allowed to mention Ballet West for at least x number of weeks (while x happens - if that can be outlined). 17 minutes ago, LinMM said: I do agree with the cautious approach etc especially as threads can move very fast sometimes so difficult to keep up with the monitoring but cannot the posts just be removed that are contravening policy etc and perhaps a reminder but the rest and thread be kept open? Having said that perhaps this particular topic today is bound to attract negative comments in the end because his statement is so obviously controversial! We do usually try not to lock threads and we only do it in certain circumstances; sometimes threads quickly descend into “Flame Wars”, become unconstructive and repetitive or sometimes - I’m sorry to say - people cannot or will not abide by the forum rules. It should be remembered that all Moderators are unpaid volunteers, all of whom have busy lives and/or jobs. We are not robots, we are not on duty 24/7 and when reports are made or threads are problematic, we have to discuss issues between ourselves. When a controversial thread is moving particularly fast, we physically cannot keep up with the number of reports made. Each report needs careful consideration and discussion and we have to do this while juggling jobs and everything else. In this case, we have no choice but to lock the thread in order to stop more and more reports popping up as people post. I hope that helps. Anna C on behalf of BalletcoForum Moderators 10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
taxi4ballet Posted November 8, 2018 Share Posted November 8, 2018 28 minutes ago, LinMM said: Having said that perhaps this particular topic today is bound to attract negative comments in the end because his statement is so obviously controversial! Is it just me, or does anyone else think he has been reading some of the threads on this forum? 7 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sarahw Posted November 8, 2018 Share Posted November 8, 2018 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now